Get interview evidence
Read the published evaluation for a specific interview attempt, including strengths, concerns, requirement coverage, and review limitations.
Before you call
Use interviews:read and schemaVersion=1. Wait for evaluation=ready or interview.result_ready.
Required scope: interviews:read.
What happens next
Save resultRevision. Skill scores are 0–10; readiness and requirement confidence/coverage are 0–100. Null means unmeasured. Raw transcripts and audio are not returned.
Recovery
If result is null, inspect preparation and evaluation states. Do not replace a failed or pending evaluation with a zero score. A new interview has a new ID; retain prior attempt identity when storing results.
Follow the complete workflow · Errors and retries
ApiKeyAuthorizationBearer <token>id*stringResource ID returned by this resource's creation or list endpoint. See prerequisites for whether this is a report, interview, job, or batch ID.
1 <= length <= 100schemaVersion?stringPublic payload format version. Result requests currently support 1; this is independent of the assigned product version.
"1"Save resultRevision. Skill scores are 0–10; readiness and requirement confidence/coverage are 0–100. Null means unmeasured. Raw transcripts and audio are not returned.
application/json- response
data*# Set PROBB_URL and PROBB_API_KEY. Replace RESOURCE_ID if present.curl --fail-with-body -X GET "$PROBB_URL/api/v1/interviews/RESOURCE_ID/result" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $PROBB_API_KEY"{ "data": { "id": "interview_example", "reportId": "report_example", "interviewSystemVersion": "assigned-interview-version", "createdAt": "2026-09-29T12:00:00.000Z", "expiresAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00.000Z", "startedAt": "2026-09-29T12:00:00.000Z", "completedAt": "2026-09-29T12:18:00.000Z", "lifecycle": "completed", "preparation": "ready", "evaluation": "ready", "emailDelivery": "sent", "resultRevision": "bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", "schemaVersion": 1, "result": { "decision": "Proceed", "limitations": "Synthetic illustration. Human review of evidence remains necessary.", "coverage": { "score": 8, "transcriptQuality": "adequate" }, "integrity": { "status": "clear", "confidence": "medium" }, "requirements": [ { "requirement": "Production incident response", "status": "supported", "score": 8, "confidence": 75, "coverage": 80, "evidence": [ "Explained an incident investigation and follow-up." ], "gaps": [ "Scale of the incident was not quantified." ], "finding": "Validate operational scope." } ], "recommendation": "Proceed", "summary": "Relevant backend reasoning with a remaining scope question.", "scores": { "coreSkill": 8, "problemSolving": 8, "communication": 7, "roleFit": 8, "readiness": 80 }, "strengths": [ "Clear explanation of investigation steps." ], "concerns": [ "Operational scale needs confirmation." ], "evidence": [ { "dimension": "problemSolving", "reasoning": "Structured investigation.", "supportingEvidence": [ "Compared queries before and after an index change." ] } ] } }}